Community

Is that really the question you want answered - better built? Or which is the better shooter, trainer, value? As for training and value the Beretta Neos was the winner in a resent Gun Tests review (bettering the S&W for one).

S&W by far I think. S&W has the Picatinny rail, fiber optic sights, two magazines, interchangeable barrel. Its no contest to me. The Browning is nice, but its the lesser gun between these two.

I won 11 of 12 slow fire pistol relays at the Gateway Dynamite shoot in 2003 with a Buckmark (made $110 for a $24 investment). The trigger and sights are good. The S&W is a comparable pistol but more money. I do not like the magazine disconnect on either gun. I'd opt for the Browning.

I believe that you would have to compare them yourself, just because I say one is better doesn't mean that the next person would say the total opposite

Buckmark has been around a lot longer than the Victory. I also like the simplicity of cleaning the Browning.