Ask the Community

I dont have this one but i have a buckmark. It is a beast of a hand gun. Its easy to use and accurate.

These go good head-to-head in matches. I would say the reputation of the Ruger is better but nothing against Browning. It cost more for a reason.

Browning has a reputation that I like and great service with my experience. I guess it'll be up to you. If you can't decide just get both of them.

I have both and in my opinion its a toss up. there are many different versions of the buckmark with different grips and grip frame you should see if a local shop has any in stock that you can handle the pick the one that feels the best

I have the Mk IV hunter in stainless steel with wood grips. More expensive but disassembly and cleanup is a breeze with the Mk IV design. I chose Ruger because I am a fan of worry-free stainless steel and it simply looks better IMO. Super accurate, too, but so is the buck mark.